Jun 24, 2008 1:01 PM
One N Done...
SU Freshman Donte Greene was just one of 14 freshmen and 69 underclassmen in total to enlist early into this years' NBA Draft. The glitz and glamour that surely await Greene have always been well documented - the eight-figure contract, the sweet signing bonus, and the gaudy shoe endorsement all come to mind. But what about the programs Greene and the rest of the '08 draft class are leaving behind?
In 2006, the NBA adopted a 19-year-old age limit in its collective bargaining agreement with the players' association. The new rule was a preventative measure against high school players jumping directly to the NBA. The can of worms that the rule opened up somehow slipped past NBA Commissioner David Stern and NCAA president Myles Brand. The phenomenon of the "one-and-done" player is sweeping the college basketball landscape. Blue-chip recruits are increasingly using universities as one-stop showcases before they bolt for the bright lights and big money of the pros.
The days of following your favorite program develop into a national championship contender seem to be long gone. Guys like Greene are putting some schools in precarious situations. While they enjoyed temporary success this past season, NCAA tournament-caliber clubs like Indiana and Kansas State may be biting the bullet in '09 with B.M.O.C.s Eric Gordon and Michael Beasley being surefire lottery picks. When asked about the rule, ESPN.com Insider Mark Schlabach wrote, "I think the one-and-done rule has all but diminished the ‘team' concept of college basketball and turned the sport into a minor-league system for the NBA...Players need to stay in college for a minimum of two or three years or not enroll at all."
A majority of fans are in agreement. Television ratings for the NCAA title game have been sliding steadily during the modern era. This year's "dream match-up" between #1's Kansas and Memphis drew a 12.1 rating and 20% share - figures half as big as the 1979 championship game when Magic and Larry Legend laced ‘em up mano e mano. The numbers don't lie - fans wants to see well-known schools with established stars. Barring exceptions few and far between, the college game fails to offer that anymore.
Granted, the current age limit can usher in interesting one-year windows when a freshman class is chock full of elite talent. But the buzz generated by a handful of superstar froshes vanishes quickly when most of them are gone the following season. In the long run, I think the rule is hurting college basketball. And I would challenge any true fan to show me how it's helping the game. What do you guys think? Do changes need to be made? Stern is considering raising the limit to age 20 in the NBA's next collective bargaining agreement. Is that asking for too much? Or, I am completely jumping the gun to nix a rule that is too new to pass judgement on?
In 2006, the NBA adopted a 19-year-old age limit in its collective bargaining agreement with the players' association. The new rule was a preventative measure against high school players jumping directly to the NBA. The can of worms that the rule opened up somehow slipped past NBA Commissioner David Stern and NCAA president Myles Brand. The phenomenon of the "one-and-done" player is sweeping the college basketball landscape. Blue-chip recruits are increasingly using universities as one-stop showcases before they bolt for the bright lights and big money of the pros.
The days of following your favorite program develop into a national championship contender seem to be long gone. Guys like Greene are putting some schools in precarious situations. While they enjoyed temporary success this past season, NCAA tournament-caliber clubs like Indiana and Kansas State may be biting the bullet in '09 with B.M.O.C.s Eric Gordon and Michael Beasley being surefire lottery picks. When asked about the rule, ESPN.com Insider Mark Schlabach wrote, "I think the one-and-done rule has all but diminished the ‘team' concept of college basketball and turned the sport into a minor-league system for the NBA...Players need to stay in college for a minimum of two or three years or not enroll at all."
A majority of fans are in agreement. Television ratings for the NCAA title game have been sliding steadily during the modern era. This year's "dream match-up" between #1's Kansas and Memphis drew a 12.1 rating and 20% share - figures half as big as the 1979 championship game when Magic and Larry Legend laced ‘em up mano e mano. The numbers don't lie - fans wants to see well-known schools with established stars. Barring exceptions few and far between, the college game fails to offer that anymore.
Granted, the current age limit can usher in interesting one-year windows when a freshman class is chock full of elite talent. But the buzz generated by a handful of superstar froshes vanishes quickly when most of them are gone the following season. In the long run, I think the rule is hurting college basketball. And I would challenge any true fan to show me how it's helping the game. What do you guys think? Do changes need to be made? Stern is considering raising the limit to age 20 in the NBA's next collective bargaining agreement. Is that asking for too much? Or, I am completely jumping the gun to nix a rule that is too new to pass judgement on?
Tags:
basketball,
syracuse,
nba_draft

